AI Mention Tracking Tools
AI mentions in answers to 3 questions
2025-12-24
About This Report
This report was generated for brands and citations mentioned in answers about AI Mention Tracking Tools from 3 AI models (namely: Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest),
OpenAI ChatGPT Latest). AI models were asked the following questions:
- "What are the top AI chat monitoring tools in 2025?" (view report)
- "How can I track AI chatbot responses across platforms?" (view report)
- "Which tools provide real-time AI monitoring and alerts?" (view report)
Brand Rankings
Brands mentioned by AI models, ranked by share of voice
| # | Brand | Voice | Position | Mentions | AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
39.9%★
|
18★ | 4.8% (21)★ |
|
| 2 |
|
28.2%↑↑
|
36↑↑ | 3.6% (16)↑↑ |
|
| 3 |
Grafana
product
|
27.8%★
|
8★ | 3.4% (15)★ |
|
| 4 |
New Relic
organization
|
26.1%★
|
3★ | 2.0% (9)★ |
|
| 5 |
Arize
organization
|
23.3%↑↑
|
37↑↑ | 1.8% (8)↑↑ |
|
| 6 |
Google
organization
|
20.8%↓
|
26↑↑ | 3.2% (14)↓ |
|
| 7 |
OpenAI
organization
|
17.6%↑↑
|
31↑↑ | 3.4% (15)↑↑ |
|
| 8 |
|
16.9%↑↑
|
36↑↑ | 0.9% (4)↑↑ |
|
| 9 |
|
16.8%↑↑
|
58↑↑ | 1.8% (8)↑↑ |
|
| 10 |
OpenTelemetry
product
|
14.6%★
|
10★ | 2.0% (9)★ |
|
| 11 |
|
13.9%★
|
52★ | 2.0% (9)★ |
|
| 12 |
|
12.6%↑↑
|
2↓ | 0.7% (3)↑↑ |
|
| 13 |
|
10.5%★
|
2★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 14 |
|
9.9%★
|
29★ | 1.6% (7)★ |
|
| 15 |
|
8.8%↑↑
|
11↑↑ | 1.1% (5)↑↑ |
|
| 16 |
Prometheus
product
|
8.7%★
|
8★ | 1.4% (6)★ |
|
| 17 |
|
7.8%↑↑
|
40↑↑ | 1.6% (7)↑↑ |
|
| 18 |
AWS
organization
|
6.8%↑↑
|
16↓ | 1.1% (5)↑↑ |
|
| 19 |
|
6.4%★
|
5★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 20 |
|
6.0%★
|
5★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 21 |
|
6.0%↑↑
|
35↑↑ | 0.9% (4)↑↑ |
|
| 22 |
LangChain
organization
|
6.0%↑↑
|
57↑↑ | 1.1% (5)↑↑ |
|
| 23 |
|
5.4%↑↑
|
44↑↑ | 0.9% (4)↑↑ |
|
| 24 |
Fiddler
organization
|
5.2%↑↑
|
45↑↑ | 0.9% (4)↑↑ |
|
| 25 |
|
4.9%★
|
48★ | 1.1% (5)★ |
|
| 26 |
|
4.6%↑↑
|
58↑↑ | 0.9% (4)↑↑ |
|
| 27 |
|
4.4%★
|
59★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 28 |
|
4.2%★
|
43★ | 0.9% (4)★ |
|
| 29 |
|
4.1%★
|
50★ | 0.9% (4)★ |
|
| 30 |
Aware
organization
|
4.1%★
|
16★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 31 |
Nightfall AI
organization
|
3.8%★
|
20★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 32 |
Gemini
product
|
3.6%↑↑
|
41↑↑ | 0.7% (3)↓ |
|
| 33 |
|
3.5%★
|
8★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 34 |
OpenAI Moderation
product
|
3.3%★
|
30★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 35 |
|
3.2%★
|
33★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 36 |
|
3.2%★
|
10★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 37 |
|
3.1%★
|
52★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 38 |
Honeycomb
organization
|
3.0%★
|
12★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 39 |
Theta Lake
organization
|
2.9%★
|
13★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 40 |
ChatGPT
product
|
2.7%↓
|
20↑↑ | 9.7% (43)↑↑ |
|
| 41 |
SafeGuard Cyber
organization
|
2.6%★
|
18★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 42 |
Smarsh
organization
|
2.5%★
|
21★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 43 |
|
2.4%★
|
18★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 44 |
Azure Monitor
organization
|
2.4%★
|
22★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 45 |
Azure AI Content Safety
product
|
2.4%★
|
24★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 46 |
|
2.3%★
|
26★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 47 |
Telegram Bot API
organization
|
2.3%★
|
24★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 48 |
Claude
product
|
2.2%↓
|
37↑↑ | 0.5% (2)↓ |
|
| 49 |
|
2.2%★
|
26★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 50 |
Spectrum Labs
organization
|
2.2%★
|
34★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 51 |
Anthropic
organization
|
2.1%↑↑
|
35↑↑ | 0.5% (2)↓ |
|
| 52 |
Guardrails AI
organization
|
2.0%★
|
44★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 53 |
Lakera Guard
organization
|
2.0%★
|
47★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 54 |
Humanloop
organization
|
2.0%↓
|
49↑↑ | 0.5% (2)↓ |
|
| 55 |
|
1.9%★
|
51★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 56 |
|
1.9%★
|
52★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 57 |
|
1.9%★
|
55★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 58 |
|
1.9%★
|
58★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 59 |
AWS CloudWatch
organization
|
1.4%★
|
14★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 60 |
Google Cloud Monitoring
organization
|
1.1%★
|
28★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 61 |
Hive Moderation
product
|
1.1%★
|
33★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 62 |
|
0.9%★
|
56★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 63 |
|
0.9%★
|
57★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 64 |
|
0.9%★
|
38★ | 2.3% (10)★ |
|
| 65 |
Mentions
product
|
0.6%↓
|
5↓ | 1.4% (6)↓ |
|
| 66 |
|
0.6%↑↑
|
1↓ | 0.7% (3)↑↑ |
|
| 67 |
TechRadar
organization
|
0.5%↓
|
22↑↑ | 1.8% (8)↓ |
|
| 68 |
|
0.4%★
|
15★ | 1.4% (6)★ |
|
| 69 |
|
0.4%↑↑
|
25↓ | 0.9% (4)↑↑ |
|
| 70 |
Evidently
organization
|
0.4%↑↑
|
26↑↑ | 0.9% (4)↑↑ |
|
| 71 |
|
0.4%★
|
12★ | 1.1% (5)★ |
|
| 72 |
Otterly.ai
product
|
0.4%★
|
14★ | 1.1% (5)★ |
|
| 73 |
Marketer Milk
organization
|
0.3%↑↑
|
35↑↑ | 1.4% (6)↑ |
|
| 74 |
New Relic AI Monitoring
product
|
0.3%↑↑
|
21↑↑ | 1.1% (5)↑↑ |
|
| 75 |
LLMRefs
product
|
0.3%★
|
13★ | 0.9% (4)★ |
|
| 76 |
|
0.3%★
|
7★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 77 |
Authoritas AI
product
|
0.2%★
|
16★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 78 |
Fireflies.ai
product
|
0.2%★
|
18★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 79 |
Jamie
product
|
0.2%★
|
19★ | 0.7% (3)★ |
|
| 80 |
|
0.2%↑↑
|
27↑↑ | 0.7% (3)↑↑ |
|
| 81 |
Rankability
product
|
0.1%★
|
17★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 82 |
|
0.1%★
|
31★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 83 |
|
0.1%↓
|
17↑↑ | 0.5% (2)↑ |
|
| 84 |
|
0.1%↓
|
22↓ | 0.5% (2)↑ |
|
| 85 |
|
0.1%★
|
26★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 86 |
|
0.1%★
|
28★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 87 |
|
0.1%★
|
29★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 88 |
|
0.1%★
|
32★ | 0.5% (2)★ |
|
| 89 |
|
0.1%↓
|
37↑↑ | 0.5% (2)↑ |
|
| 90 |
|
0.1%↑↑
|
46↑↑ | 0.5% (2)↑↑ |
|
| 91 |
MLflow
product
|
0.1%↓
|
52↑↑ | 0.5% (2)↓ |
|
| 92 |
Perplexity
organization
|
0.1%↓
|
23↑↑ | 0.2% (1)↓ |
|
| 93 |
|
0.1%★
|
30★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 94 |
Nimt.ai
product
|
0.1%↓
|
34↑↑ | 0.2% (1)↓ |
|
| 95 |
|
0.1%↓
|
12↓ | 0.2% (1)↓ |
|
| 96 |
|
0.0%★
|
13★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 97 |
|
0.0%★
|
16★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 98 |
|
0.0%★
|
18★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 99 |
LangSmith by LangChain
product
|
0.0%↓
|
20↑↑ | 0.2% (1)↑ |
|
| 100 |
|
0.0%★
|
24★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 101 |
|
0.0%↓
|
25↑↑ | 0.2% (1)↓ |
|
| 102 |
|
0.0%★
|
31★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 103 |
|
0.0%★
|
33★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 104 |
|
0.0%★
|
34★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 105 |
|
0.0%★
|
36★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 106 |
|
0.0%★
|
41★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 107 |
|
0.0%★
|
43★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 108 |
Google Analytics 4
product
|
0.0%★
|
45★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 109 |
Meta Business Suite
organization
|
0.0%★
|
47★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 110 |
Discord Developer Portal
organization
|
0.0%★
|
51★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 111 |
|
0.0%★
|
53★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 112 |
|
0.0%★
|
54★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 113 |
|
0.0%★
|
58★ | 0.2% (1)★ |
|
| 114 |
Zendesk QA
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 115 |
Talkdesk
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 116 |
MaestroQA
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 117 |
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
|
| 118 |
InsightFinder
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 119 |
Relixir
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 120 |
Writesonic
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 121 |
Ziptie
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 122 |
Perplexity AI
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 123 |
AI Product Rankings
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 124 |
Peec AI
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 125 |
Scrunch AI
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 126 |
AthenaHQ
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 127 |
BrandLight
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 128 |
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
|
| 129 |
ChatHub
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 130 |
Poe
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 131 |
OpenRouter
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 132 |
Prompt Layer
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 133 |
Portkey
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 134 |
LiteLLM
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 135 |
Notion
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 136 |
Airtable
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 137 |
Google Sheets
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 138 |
ChatGPT Exporter
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 139 |
Save ChatGPT
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 140 |
HumanFirst
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 141 |
Botpress Analytics
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 142 |
Track AI Answers
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 143 |
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
|
| 144 |
mSpy
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 145 |
Phoenix by Arize
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 146 |
AWS SageMaker Model Monitor
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 147 |
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
|
| 148 |
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
|
| 149 |
Neptune.ai
product
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 150 |
Quora
organization
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 151 |
Omnius
organization
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 152 |
Genezio
organization
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 153 |
Neptune
organization
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 154 |
Synthesia
organization
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
| 155 |
BigSur
organization
|
0.0%↓↓
|
-1 | 0.0% (0)↓↓ |
|
Per-Question Reports
View detailed rankings for each individual question
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this AI Mentions Report about?
What questions were analyzed in this report?
- "What are the top AI chat monitoring tools in 2025?" (view report)
- "How can I track AI chatbot responses across platforms?" (view report)
- "Which tools provide real-time AI monitoring and alerts?" (view report)
How many brands were analyzed in this report?
How many web sources were detected?
Which brands are mentioned most by AI models?
How many AI models were analyzed?
What does "Share of Voice" mean and how is it calculated?
Formula: Share of Voice = Model Coverage × Quality Score
Where:
• Model Coverage = Sum of normalized weights for models mentioning the brand
• Quality Score = Prominence / Max Prominence in dataset
• Prominence = Mentions × (1 / log₂(Position + 1))
Model weights (based on Monthly Active Users):
• OpenAI ChatGPT Latest: 900M MAU (~92.3% weight)
• Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest): 45M MAU (~4.6% weight)
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest): 30M MAU (~3.1% weight)
Brands appearing in top positions across high-traffic models achieve higher Share of Voice.