Cybersecurity
AI mentions in answers to 3 questions
2025-12-30
167
Brands
256
Sources
3
Questions
5
AI Models
About This Report
This report was generated for brands and citations mentioned in answers about Cybersecurity from 5 AI models (namely: Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest),
OpenAI ChatGPT Latest,
Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest)). AI models were asked the following questions:
- "What are the best Cybersecurity options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space." (view report)
- "If I'm looking to get into Cybersecurity, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed." (view report)
- "What does the Cybersecurity industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry." (view report)
Brand Rankings
Brands mentioned by AI models, ranked by share of voice
| # | Brand | Voice | Position | Mentions | AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
100.0%★
|
5★ | 3.6% (42)★ |
|
| 2 |
|
91.2%★
|
6★ | 3.6% (42)★ |
|
| 3 |
|
80.3%★
|
8★ | 5.1% (59)★ |
|
| 4 |
Gartner
organization
|
73.4%★
|
22★ | 3.2% (37)★ |
|
| 5 |
Cisco
organization
|
48.2%★
|
9★ | 2.8% (33)★ |
|
| 6 |
|
46.0%★
|
11★ | 2.5% (29)★ |
|
| 7 |
NIST
organization
|
41.8%★
|
5★ | 2.1% (24)★ |
|
| 8 |
OWASP
organization
|
30.6%★
|
19★ | 2.8% (33)★ |
|
| 9 |
FIRST
organization
|
28.9%★
|
19★ | 1.3% (15)★ |
|
| 10 |
|
28.2%★
|
26★ | 2.8% (33)★ |
|
| 11 |
|
27.9%★
|
12★ | 2.4% (28)★ |
|
| 12 |
|
23.1%★
|
17★ | 1.8% (21)★ |
|
| 13 |
|
20.8%★
|
30★ | 2.0% (23)★ |
|
| 14 |
|
20.1%★
|
7★ | 1.4% (16)★ |
|
| 15 |
|
17.9%★
|
15★ | 1.3% (15)★ |
|
| 16 |
|
16.6%★
|
14★ | 1.4% (16)★ |
|
| 17 |
|
15.2%★
|
27★ | 1.1% (13)★ |
|
| 18 |
|
14.3%★
|
36★ | 1.7% (20)★ |
|
| 19 |
|
13.0%★
|
20★ | 1.2% (14)★ |
|
| 20 |
|
12.9%★
|
33★ | 1.4% (16)★ |
|
| 21 |
ISACA
organization
|
12.7%★
|
26★ | 1.2% (14)★ |
|
| 22 |
Black Hat
event
|
12.1%★
|
53★ | 1.6% (19)★ |
|
| 23 |
DEF CON
event
|
12.0%★
|
54★ | 1.6% (19)★ |
|
| 24 |
CISA
organization
|
11.8%★
|
4★ | 1.3% (15)★ |
|
| 25 |
|
11.1%★
|
20★ | 1.1% (13)★ |
|
| 26 |
RSA Conference
event
|
10.3%★
|
52★ | 1.4% (16)★ |
|
| 27 |
Troy Hunt
person
|
10.0%★
|
39★ | 1.2% (14)★ |
|
| 28 |
Brian Krebs
person
|
9.8%★
|
34★ | 1.1% (13)★ |
|
| 29 |
Krebs on Security
product
|
9.5%★
|
37★ | 1.0% (12)★ |
|
| 30 |
|
9.2%★
|
60★ | 1.3% (15)★ |
|
| 31 |
|
8.9%★
|
30★ | 1.0% (12)★ |
|
| 32 |
SANS Institute
organization
|
8.4%★
|
26★ | 0.8% (9)★ |
|
| 33 |
|
8.1%★
|
27★ | 0.9% (11)★ |
|
| 34 |
BSides
event
|
8.1%★
|
55★ | 1.1% (13)★ |
|
| 35 |
|
7.9%★
|
60★ | 1.1% (13)★ |
|
| 36 |
|
7.8%★
|
62★ | 1.0% (12)★ |
|
| 37 |
Bruce Schneier
person
|
7.6%★
|
39★ | 0.9% (11)★ |
|
| 38 |
Offensive Security
organization
|
5.8%★
|
28★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
| 39 |
Deloitte Cyber
organization
|
5.7%★
|
42★ | 0.6% (7)★ |
|
| 40 |
|
5.4%★
|
26★ | 0.6% (7)★ |
|
| 41 |
|
5.4%★
|
20★ | 0.9% (10)★ |
|
| 42 |
Katie Moussouris
person
|
5.1%★
|
44★ | 0.7% (8)★ |
|
| 43 |
|
5.1%★
|
13★ | 0.6% (7)★ |
|
| 44 |
Mikko Hyppönen
person
|
5.0%★
|
38★ | 0.6% (7)★ |
|
| 45 |
r/netsec
person
|
4.7%★
|
74★ | 1.0% (12)★ |
|
| 46 |
Reddit r/cybersecurity
organization
|
4.6%★
|
59★ | 0.6% (7)★ |
|
| 47 |
|
4.4%★
|
15★ | 0.4% (5)★ |
|
| 48 |
Gartner Security
organization
|
4.2%★
|
61★ | 0.6% (7)★ |
|
| 49 |
|
4.1%★
|
38★ | 0.8% (9)★ |
|
| 50 |
|
3.8%★
|
41★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
| 51 |
Accenture Security
organization
|
3.7%★
|
40★ | 0.4% (5)★ |
|
| 52 |
3.7%★
|
60★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
|
| 53 |
|
3.7%★
|
62★ | 0.8% (9)★ |
|
| 54 |
|
3.5%★
|
12★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
| 55 |
|
3.2%★
|
57★ | 0.7% (8)★ |
|
| 56 |
|
3.0%★
|
24★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
| 57 |
1Password
product
|
2.8%★
|
41★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
| 58 |
Bitwarden
product
|
2.5%★
|
43★ | 0.4% (5)★ |
|
| 59 |
KrebsOnSecurity
organization
|
2.5%★
|
59★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 60 |
|
2.2%★
|
39★ | 0.4% (5)★ |
|
| 61 |
Kevin Mitnick
person
|
2.2%★
|
34★ | 0.6% (7)★ |
|
| 62 |
CSO Online
product
|
2.2%★
|
81★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
| 63 |
|
2.1%★
|
54★ | 0.4% (5)★ |
|
| 64 |
|
2.0%★
|
24★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 65 |
|
1.9%★
|
69★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
| 66 |
|
1.9%★
|
71★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
| 67 |
Cyberscoop
organization
|
1.8%★
|
56★ | 0.6% (7)★ |
|
| 68 |
OWASP Global AppSec
event
|
1.7%★
|
64★ | 0.4% (5)★ |
|
| 69 |
|
1.6%★
|
41★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 70 |
|
1.5%★
|
43★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 71 |
Schneier on Security
product
|
1.5%★
|
37★ | 0.4% (5)★ |
|
| 72 |
Reddit r/netsec
organization
|
1.5%★
|
73★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 73 |
CVE
organization
|
1.4%★
|
36★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 74 |
NVD
organization
|
1.4%★
|
38★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 75 |
IBM Security
organization
|
1.3%★
|
27★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 76 |
SANS Cyber Security
organization
|
1.3%★
|
80★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 77 |
Security Now
organization
|
1.3%★
|
74★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 78 |
|
1.2%★
|
54★ | 0.4% (5)★ |
|
| 79 |
Wireshark
product
|
1.1%★
|
37★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 80 |
Nmap
product
|
1.1%★
|
40★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 81 |
NCC Group
organization
|
1.1%★
|
58★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 82 |
Bishop Fox
organization
|
1.1%★
|
67★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 83 |
Microsoft Security Blog
product
|
1.0%★
|
50★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 84 |
Graham Cluley
person
|
1.0%★
|
20★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 85 |
|
0.9%★
|
35★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 86 |
0.7%★
|
59★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
|
| 87 |
Wired - Security
product
|
0.6%★
|
79★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 88 |
Google Project Zero
product
|
0.6%★
|
80★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 89 |
|
0.3%★
|
85★ | 0.9% (10)★ |
|
| 90 |
Secureworks
organization
|
0.2%★
|
26★ | 0.5% (6)★ |
|
| 91 |
ShmooCon
event
|
0.2%★
|
75★ | 0.7% (8)★ |
|
| 92 |
|
0.1%★
|
61★ | 0.4% (5)★ |
|
| 93 |
|
0.1%★
|
59★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 94 |
AWS re:Inforce
event
|
0.1%★
|
81★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 95 |
Stack Exchange Information Security
organization
|
0.1%★
|
70★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 96 |
George Kurtz
person
|
0.1%★
|
41★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 97 |
|
0.0%★
|
84★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 98 |
|
0.0%★
|
134★ | 0.3% (3)★ |
|
| 99 |
|
0.0%★
|
27★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 100 |
Kali Linux
product
|
0.0%★
|
44★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 101 |
Metasploit
product
|
0.0%★
|
46★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 102 |
LastPass
product
|
0.0%★
|
62★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 103 |
|
0.0%★
|
74★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 104 |
NetworkChuck
person
|
0.0%★
|
76★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 105 |
LiveOverflow
person
|
0.0%★
|
82★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 106 |
Infosecurity Europe
event
|
0.0%★
|
102★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 107 |
InfraGard
organization
|
0.0%★
|
101★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 108 |
44CON
event
|
0.0%★
|
113★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 109 |
CCC
event
|
0.0%★
|
115★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 110 |
Smashing Security
organization
|
0.0%★
|
162★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 111 |
|
0.0%★
|
159★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 112 |
Ars Technica Security
product
|
0.0%★
|
130★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 113 |
VirusTotal
product
|
0.0%★
|
145★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 114 |
ENISA
organization
|
0.0%★
|
152★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 115 |
CyberSeek
organization
|
0.0%★
|
155★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 116 |
Ars Technica - Security
product
|
0.0%★
|
131★ | 0.2% (2)★ |
|
| 117 |
Carbon Black
product
|
0.0%★
|
17★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 118 |
|
0.0%★
|
18★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 119 |
|
0.0%★
|
25★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 120 |
PwC Cybersecurity
organization
|
0.0%★
|
42★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 121 |
|
0.0%★
|
32★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 122 |
Burp Suite
product
|
0.0%★
|
49★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 123 |
ReliaQuest
organization
|
0.0%★
|
45★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 124 |
0.0%★
|
67★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
|
| 125 |
MIT CSAIL Cybersecurity
organization
|
0.0%★
|
70★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 126 |
Beyond Identity
product
|
0.0%★
|
79★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 127 |
|
0.0%★
|
81★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 128 |
|
0.0%★
|
85★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 129 |
|
0.0%★
|
88★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 130 |
The Cyber Mentor
person
|
0.0%★
|
80★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 131 |
Tarah Wheeler
person
|
0.0%★
|
61★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 132 |
Nikesh Arora
person
|
0.0%★
|
63★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 133 |
Tomer Weingarten
person
|
0.0%★
|
65★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 134 |
Assaf Rappaport
person
|
0.0%★
|
66★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 135 |
Jeremiah Grossman
person
|
0.0%★
|
68★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 136 |
|
0.0%★
|
92★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 137 |
0.0%★
|
105★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
|
| 138 |
CyCon
event
|
0.0%★
|
110★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 139 |
0.0%★
|
114★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
|
| 140 |
DevSecCon
event
|
0.0%★
|
116★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 141 |
Hack The Box Forums
organization
|
0.0%★
|
119★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 142 |
TryHackMe Community
organization
|
0.0%★
|
120★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 143 |
ISSA
organization
|
0.0%★
|
125★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 144 |
AlienVault OTX
organization
|
0.0%★
|
137★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 145 |
|
0.0%★
|
118★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 146 |
Security Week
product
|
0.0%★
|
128★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 147 |
Naked Security
product
|
0.0%★
|
132★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 148 |
SANS Internet Stormcast
product
|
0.0%★
|
139★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 149 |
Exploit Database
organization
|
0.0%★
|
142★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 150 |
SANS Security Training
event
|
0.0%★
|
100★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 151 |
SecureWorld
event
|
0.0%★
|
103★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 152 |
0.0%★
|
104★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
|
| 153 |
0.0%★
|
106★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
|
| 154 |
FS-ISAC
organization
|
0.0%★
|
121★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 155 |
Health-ISAC
organization
|
0.0%★
|
122★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 156 |
Talos Intelligence Blog
product
|
0.0%★
|
156★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 157 |
Krebs Stamos Group Blog
product
|
0.0%★
|
158★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 158 |
Forrester Security & Risk
organization
|
0.0%★
|
163★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 159 |
IDC Security
organization
|
0.0%★
|
164★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 160 |
Mandiant M-Trends
product
|
0.0%★
|
165★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 161 |
IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report
product
|
0.0%★
|
166★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 162 |
Crowdstrike Global Threat Report
product
|
0.0%★
|
167★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 163 |
AlienVault Open Threat Exchange
organization
|
0.0%★
|
144★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 164 |
LinkedIn Learning
organization
|
0.0%★
|
157★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 165 |
Help Net Security
product
|
0.0%★
|
143★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 166 |
SC Magazine
product
|
0.0%★
|
149★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 167 |
Forrester Research
organization
|
0.0%★
|
154★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
Per-Question Reports
View detailed rankings for each individual question
1
What are the best Cybersecurity options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space.
2
If I'm looking to get into Cybersecurity, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed.
3
What does the Cybersecurity industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this AI Mentions Report about?
This report analyzes how AI chatbots like Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest), OpenAI ChatGPT Latest, Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest) respond to questions related to Cybersecurity. It identifies which brands, products, and organizations are mentioned most frequently and measures their share of voice in AI responses.
What questions were analyzed in this report?
This report analyzed answers to 3 questions:
- "What are the best Cybersecurity options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space." (view report)
- "If I'm looking to get into Cybersecurity, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed." (view report)
- "What does the Cybersecurity industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry." (view report)
How many brands were analyzed in this report?
This report analyzed 167 unique brands mentioned across 5 AI models.
How many web sources were detected?
AI models cited 256 unique web sources (domains) when answering questions.
Which brands are mentioned most by AI models?
The top 3 most mentioned brands are CrowdStrike (organization,product), Palo Alto Networks (organization,product), Microsoft (organization,product), based on analysis of 5 AI model responses.
How many AI models were analyzed?
This report analyzed responses from 5 AI models: Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest), OpenAI ChatGPT Latest, Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest).
What does "Share of Voice" mean and how is it calculated?
Share of Voice (Voice %) measures brand prominence across AI models.
Formula: Share of Voice = Model Coverage × Quality Score
Where:
• Model Coverage = Sum of normalized weights for models mentioning the brand
• Quality Score = Prominence / Max Prominence in dataset
• Prominence = Mentions × (1 / log₂(Position + 1))
Model weights (based on Monthly Active Users):
• OpenAI ChatGPT Latest: 900M MAU (~54.1% weight)
• Google Gemini Flash (latest): 650M MAU (~39.1% weight)
• Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest): 45M MAU (~2.7% weight)
• X.AI Grok (latest): 39M MAU (~2.3% weight)
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest): 30M MAU (~1.8% weight)
Brands appearing in top positions across high-traffic models achieve higher Share of Voice.
Formula: Share of Voice = Model Coverage × Quality Score
Where:
• Model Coverage = Sum of normalized weights for models mentioning the brand
• Quality Score = Prominence / Max Prominence in dataset
• Prominence = Mentions × (1 / log₂(Position + 1))
Model weights (based on Monthly Active Users):
• OpenAI ChatGPT Latest: 900M MAU (~54.1% weight)
• Google Gemini Flash (latest): 650M MAU (~39.1% weight)
• Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest): 45M MAU (~2.7% weight)
• X.AI Grok (latest): 39M MAU (~2.3% weight)
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest): 30M MAU (~1.8% weight)
Brands appearing in top positions across high-traffic models achieve higher Share of Voice.