Open Source Projects
AI mentions in answers to 3 questions
2025-12-30
148
Brands
320
Sources
3
Questions
5
AI Models
About This Report
This report was generated for brands and citations mentioned in answers about Open Source Projects from 5 AI models (namely: Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest),
OpenAI ChatGPT Latest,
Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest)). AI models were asked the following questions:
- "What are the best Open Source Projects options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space." (view report)
- "If I'm looking to get into Open Source Projects, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed." (view report)
- "What does the Open Sources Projects industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry." (view report)
Brand Rankings
Brands mentioned by AI models, ranked by share of voice
| # | Brand | Voice | Position | Mentions | AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
100.0%★
|
13★ | 13.4% (206)★ |
|
| 2 |
Linux
product
|
56.7%★
|
3★ | 8.6% (132)★ |
|
| 3 |
Linux Foundation
organization
|
14.4%★
|
12★ | 3.6% (56)★ |
|
| 4 |
Kubernetes
product
|
11.0%★
|
7★ | 3.8% (58)★ |
|
| 5 |
|
7.2%★
|
11★ | 2.5% (39)★ |
|
| 6 |
|
6.1%★
|
16★ | 2.1% (32)★ |
|
| 7 |
Dev.to
organization
|
5.0%★
|
62★ | 2.1% (32)★ |
|
| 8 |
Git
product
|
4.6%★
|
27★ | 1.9% (30)★ |
|
| 9 |
|
4.4%★
|
54★ | 1.8% (27)★ |
|
| 10 |
|
3.2%★
|
6★ | 1.2% (19)★ |
|
| 11 |
Microsoft
organization
|
3.1%★
|
30★ | 0.8% (13)★ |
|
| 12 |
Python
product
|
3.0%★
|
19★ | 2.3% (36)★ |
|
| 13 |
Stack Overflow
organization
|
3.0%★
|
61★ | 1.4% (21)★ |
|
| 14 |
|
2.9%★
|
22★ | 1.3% (20)★ |
|
| 15 |
The Linux Foundation
organization
|
2.8%★
|
12★ | 0.9% (14)★ |
|
| 16 |
Apache Software Foundation
organization
|
2.8%★
|
16★ | 1.1% (17)★ |
|
| 17 |
Canonical
organization
|
2.6%★
|
20★ | 1.2% (18)★ |
|
| 18 |
FOSDEM
event
|
2.0%★
|
60★ | 1.3% (20)★ |
|
| 19 |
Opensource.com
organization
|
2.0%★
|
72★ | 1.3% (20)★ |
|
| 20 |
|
1.9%★
|
55★ | 1.0% (16)★ |
|
| 21 |
Cloud Native Computing Foundation
organization
|
1.8%★
|
21★ | 0.8% (12)★ |
|
| 22 |
|
1.7%★
|
40★ | 0.8% (13)★ |
|
| 23 |
|
1.6%★
|
45★ | 0.7% (11)★ |
|
| 24 |
Google
organization
|
1.6%★
|
31★ | 1.4% (22)★ |
|
| 25 |
Changelog
product
|
1.5%★
|
75★ | 1.0% (16)★ |
|
| 26 |
Kelsey Hightower
person
|
1.5%★
|
45★ | 0.8% (13)★ |
|
| 27 |
Terraform
product
|
1.4%★
|
29★ | 0.7% (11)★ |
|
| 28 |
Linus Torvalds
person
|
1.4%★
|
43★ | 0.8% (12)★ |
|
| 29 |
Reddit
organization
|
1.3%★
|
66★ | 0.8% (13)★ |
|
| 30 |
Node.js
product
|
1.3%★
|
21★ | 0.8% (12)★ |
|
| 31 |
PostgreSQL
product
|
1.2%★
|
29★ | 0.7% (11)★ |
|
| 32 |
|
1.2%★
|
71★ | 0.8% (13)★ |
|
| 33 |
|
1.2%★
|
46★ | 0.6% (10)★ |
|
| 34 |
Hacker News
organization
|
1.2%★
|
69★ | 0.8% (12)★ |
|
| 35 |
TensorFlow
product
|
1.2%★
|
37★ | 0.6% (9)★ |
|
| 36 |
Open Source Initiative
organization
|
1.1%★
|
4★ | 0.5% (8)★ |
|
| 37 |
SCALE
event
|
1.1%★
|
28★ | 0.6% (9)★ |
|
| 38 |
Open Source Summit
event
|
1.0%★
|
64★ | 0.7% (11)★ |
|
| 39 |
Free Software Foundation
organization
|
1.0%★
|
2★ | 0.5% (7)★ |
|
| 40 |
First Timers Only
product
|
0.9%★
|
41★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 41 |
|
0.9%★
|
72★ | 0.6% (10)★ |
|
| 42 |
PyTorch
product
|
0.9%★
|
36★ | 0.5% (7)★ |
|
| 43 |
|
0.9%★
|
45★ | 0.5% (7)★ |
|
| 44 |
All Things Open
event
|
0.9%★
|
71★ | 0.6% (9)★ |
|
| 45 |
OpenSSF
organization
|
0.9%★
|
33★ | 0.5% (7)★ |
|
| 46 |
Docker
product
|
0.9%★
|
11★ | 1.0% (15)★ |
|
| 47 |
|
0.9%★
|
44★ | 0.5% (7)★ |
|
| 48 |
Fedora
product
|
0.8%★
|
11★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 49 |
|
0.8%★
|
42★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 50 |
Bitbucket
organization
|
0.8%★
|
22★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 51 |
|
0.8%★
|
46★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 52 |
Apache Spark
product
|
0.8%★
|
31★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 53 |
Tidelift
product
|
0.7%★
|
47★ | 0.5% (8)★ |
|
| 54 |
Apache HTTP Server
product
|
0.7%★
|
45★ | 0.5% (8)★ |
|
| 55 |
Good First Issue
product
|
0.7%★
|
40★ | 0.5% (8)★ |
|
| 56 |
Redis
product
|
0.7%★
|
33★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 57 |
React
product
|
0.6%★
|
22★ | 0.7% (11)★ |
|
| 58 |
GitHub Universe
event
|
0.6%★
|
74★ | 0.6% (9)★ |
|
| 59 |
|
0.6%★
|
22★ | 0.7% (11)★ |
|
| 60 |
SUSE
organization
|
0.6%★
|
30★ | 0.6% (9)★ |
|
| 61 |
The Changelog
organization
|
0.6%★
|
74★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 62 |
MySQL
product
|
0.6%★
|
37★ | 0.6% (9)★ |
|
| 63 |
OSCON
event
|
0.6%★
|
44★ | 0.8% (12)★ |
|
| 64 |
|
0.6%★
|
27★ | 0.7% (11)★ |
|
| 65 |
Eclipse Foundation
organization
|
0.5%★
|
15★ | 0.5% (7)★ |
|
| 66 |
|
0.5%★
|
86★ | 0.6% (9)★ |
|
| 67 |
Meta
organization
|
0.5%★
|
25★ | 0.6% (9)★ |
|
| 68 |
PyCon
event
|
0.5%★
|
75★ | 0.6% (9)★ |
|
| 69 |
freeCodeCamp
organization
|
0.4%★
|
44★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 70 |
FreeBSD
product
|
0.4%★
|
21★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 71 |
Python Software Foundation
organization
|
0.4%★
|
18★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 72 |
Richard Stallman
person
|
0.4%★
|
50★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 73 |
Prometheus
product
|
0.4%★
|
39★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 74 |
Discourse
organization
|
0.4%★
|
42★ | 0.5% (7)★ |
|
| 75 |
LangChain
product
|
0.4%★
|
52★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 76 |
Phoronix
organization
|
0.4%★
|
88★ | 0.5% (7)★ |
|
| 77 |
Debian
product
|
0.4%★
|
13★ | 0.3% (5)★ |
|
| 78 |
MariaDB
product
|
0.4%★
|
38★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 79 |
Guido van Rossum
person
|
0.4%★
|
52★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 80 |
Reddit - r/opensource
organization
|
0.4%★
|
79★ | 0.4% (6)★ |
|
| 81 |
Ansible
product
|
0.3%★
|
26★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 82 |
NGINX
product
|
0.3%★
|
47★ | 0.3% (5)★ |
|
| 83 |
Software Freedom Conservancy
organization
|
0.3%★
|
21★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 84 |
Amazon Web Services
organization
|
0.3%★
|
28★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 85 |
Open Collective
product
|
0.3%★
|
47★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 86 |
|
0.3%★
|
71★ | 0.3% (5)★ |
|
| 87 |
Jenkins
product
|
0.2%★
|
35★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 88 |
CNCF Slack
organization
|
0.2%★
|
80★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 89 |
Codeberg
organization
|
0.2%★
|
34★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 90 |
AlternativeTo
organization
|
0.2%★
|
62★ | 0.3% (5)★ |
|
| 91 |
|
0.2%★
|
63★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 92 |
OpenJS Foundation
organization
|
0.2%★
|
24★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 93 |
ZDNet
organization
|
0.2%★
|
60★ | 0.3% (5)★ |
|
| 94 |
CodeTriage
product
|
0.2%★
|
45★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 95 |
Dan Abramov
person
|
0.2%★
|
75★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 96 |
|
0.2%★
|
64★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 97 |
LibreOffice
product
|
0.2%★
|
62★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 98 |
|
0.2%★
|
66★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 99 |
Plausible
organization
|
0.2%★
|
73★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 100 |
TechCrunch
organization
|
0.1%★
|
52★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 101 |
Openbase
product
|
0.1%★
|
59★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 102 |
NocoDB
organization
|
0.0%★
|
55★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 103 |
|
0.0%★
|
52★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 104 |
Open Source Guides
organization
|
0.0%★
|
42★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 105 |
Directus
organization
|
0.0%★
|
62★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 106 |
Open Source Collective
organization
|
0.0%★
|
86★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 107 |
Cal.com
organization
|
0.0%★
|
86★ | 0.3% (5)★ |
|
| 108 |
Mozilla Foundation
organization
|
0.0%★
|
12★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 109 |
Nadia Eghbal
person
|
0.0%★
|
48★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 110 |
KubeCon + CloudNativeCon
event
|
0.0%★
|
71★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 111 |
Awesome Lists
event
|
0.0%★
|
97★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 112 |
Vue.js
product
|
0.0%★
|
59★ | 0.3% (4)★ |
|
| 113 |
SourceForge
organization
|
0.0%★
|
14★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 114 |
Thunderbird
product
|
0.0%★
|
42★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 115 |
Tauri
organization
|
0.0%★
|
97★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 116 |
Linux Journal
organization
|
0.0%★
|
110★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 117 |
The Register
organization
|
0.0%★
|
119★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 118 |
Ars Technica
organization
|
0.0%★
|
122★ | 0.2% (3)★ |
|
| 119 |
Chromium
product
|
0.0%★
|
74★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 120 |
Brendan Eich
person
|
0.0%★
|
73★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 121 |
Jessie Frazelle
person
|
0.0%★
|
62★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 122 |
Sindre Sorhus
person
|
0.0%★
|
56★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 123 |
Guillermo Rauch
person
|
0.0%★
|
65★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 124 |
Hashnode
organization
|
0.0%★
|
72★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 125 |
Django
product
|
0.0%★
|
92★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 126 |
Ruby on Rails
product
|
0.0%★
|
94★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 127 |
Joomla
product
|
0.0%★
|
101★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 128 |
WooCommerce
product
|
0.0%★
|
102★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 129 |
|
0.0%★
|
103★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 130 |
PrestaShop
product
|
0.0%★
|
104★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 131 |
ONLYOFFICE
product
|
0.0%★
|
111★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 132 |
Pocketbase
organization
|
0.0%★
|
126★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 133 |
Excalidraw
organization
|
0.0%★
|
129★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 134 |
Red Hat Summit
event
|
0.0%★
|
132★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 135 |
DockerCon
event
|
0.0%★
|
133★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 136 |
FOSS Force
organization
|
0.0%★
|
139★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 137 |
It's FOSS
organization
|
0.0%★
|
140★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 138 |
Product Hunt
organization
|
0.0%★
|
145★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 139 |
Libraries.io
organization
|
0.0%★
|
147★ | 0.1% (2)★ |
|
| 140 |
Mitchell Baker
person
|
0.0%★
|
120★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 141 |
Jim Whitehurst
person
|
0.0%★
|
123★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 142 |
Chris DiBona
person
|
0.0%★
|
124★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 143 |
0.0%★
|
130★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
|
| 144 |
0.0%★
|
131★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
|
| 145 |
Linux Foundation Community
organization
|
0.0%★
|
134★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 146 |
Open Source Awards
event
|
0.0%★
|
142★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 147 |
Open Source Observatory
organization
|
0.0%★
|
146★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
| 148 |
State of Open Con
event
|
0.0%★
|
105★ | 0.1% (1)★ |
|
Per-Question Reports
View detailed rankings for each individual question
1
What are the best Open Source Projects options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space.
2
If I'm looking to get into Open Source Projects, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed.
3
What does the Open Sources Projects industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this AI Mentions Report about?
This report analyzes how AI chatbots like Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest), OpenAI ChatGPT Latest, Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest) respond to questions related to Open Source Projects. It identifies which brands, products, and organizations are mentioned most frequently and measures their share of voice in AI responses.
What questions were analyzed in this report?
This report analyzed answers to 3 questions:
- "What are the best Open Source Projects options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space." (view report)
- "If I'm looking to get into Open Source Projects, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed." (view report)
- "What does the Open Sources Projects industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry." (view report)
How many brands were analyzed in this report?
This report analyzed 148 unique brands mentioned across 5 AI models.
How many web sources were detected?
AI models cited 320 unique web sources (domains) when answering questions.
Which brands are mentioned most by AI models?
The top 3 most mentioned brands are GitHub (organization,product), Linux (product), Linux Foundation (organization), based on analysis of 5 AI model responses.
How many AI models were analyzed?
This report analyzed responses from 5 AI models: Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest), OpenAI ChatGPT Latest, Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest).
What does "Share of Voice" mean and how is it calculated?
Share of Voice (Voice %) measures brand prominence across AI models.
Formula: Share of Voice = Model Coverage × Quality Score
Where:
• Model Coverage = Sum of normalized weights for models mentioning the brand
• Quality Score = Prominence / Max Prominence in dataset
• Prominence = Mentions × (1 / log₂(Position + 1))
Model weights (based on Monthly Active Users):
• OpenAI ChatGPT Latest: 900M MAU (~54.1% weight)
• Google Gemini Flash (latest): 650M MAU (~39.1% weight)
• Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest): 45M MAU (~2.7% weight)
• X.AI Grok (latest): 39M MAU (~2.3% weight)
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest): 30M MAU (~1.8% weight)
Brands appearing in top positions across high-traffic models achieve higher Share of Voice.
Formula: Share of Voice = Model Coverage × Quality Score
Where:
• Model Coverage = Sum of normalized weights for models mentioning the brand
• Quality Score = Prominence / Max Prominence in dataset
• Prominence = Mentions × (1 / log₂(Position + 1))
Model weights (based on Monthly Active Users):
• OpenAI ChatGPT Latest: 900M MAU (~54.1% weight)
• Google Gemini Flash (latest): 650M MAU (~39.1% weight)
• Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest): 45M MAU (~2.7% weight)
• X.AI Grok (latest): 39M MAU (~2.3% weight)
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest): 30M MAU (~1.8% weight)
Brands appearing in top positions across high-traffic models achieve higher Share of Voice.