Cybersecurity
AI mentions in answer for 1 question: "What are the best Cybersecurity options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space."
2025-12-30
106
Brands
147
Sources
1
Questions
5
AI Models
About This Report
This report was generated for brands and citations mentioned in answers about Cybersecurity from 5 AI models (namely: Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest),
OpenAI ChatGPT Latest,
Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest)). AI models were asked the following questions:
- "What are the best Cybersecurity options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space." (view report)
- "If I'm looking to get into Cybersecurity, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed." (view report)
- "What does the Cybersecurity industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry." (view report)
Brand Rankings
Brands mentioned by AI models, ranked by share of voice
| # | Brand | Voice | Position | Mentions | AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
100.0%★
|
3★ | 5.0% (15)★ |
|
| 2 |
|
95.8%★
|
2★ | 3.7% (11)★ |
|
| 3 |
|
52.7%★
|
5★ | 3.3% (10)★ |
|
| 4 |
|
42.8%★
|
3★ | 2.0% (6)★ |
|
| 5 |
|
21.7%★
|
7★ | 2.0% (6)★ |
|
| 6 |
OWASP
organization
|
20.9%★
|
27★ | 3.3% (10)★ |
|
| 7 |
|
19.9%★
|
20★ | 2.3% (7)★ |
|
| 8 |
|
19.3%★
|
22★ | 2.3% (7)★ |
|
| 9 |
|
18.5%★
|
18★ | 2.3% (7)★ |
|
| 10 |
Black Hat
event
|
15.1%★
|
31★ | 2.3% (7)★ |
|
| 11 |
DEF CON
event
|
14.9%★
|
33★ | 2.3% (7)★ |
|
| 12 |
Accenture Security
organization
|
13.9%★
|
20★ | 1.7% (5)★ |
|
| 13 |
Deloitte Cyber
organization
|
13.8%★
|
21★ | 1.7% (5)★ |
|
| 14 |
Dark Reading
organization
|
12.3%★
|
40★ | 2.0% (6)★ |
|
| 15 |
Bruce Schneier
person
|
12.2%★
|
23★ | 1.7% (5)★ |
|
| 16 |
The Hacker News
organization
|
12.2%★
|
41★ | 2.0% (6)★ |
|
| 17 |
Brian Krebs
person
|
11.9%★
|
24★ | 1.7% (5)★ |
|
| 18 |
RSA Conference
event
|
11.0%★
|
30★ | 1.7% (5)★ |
|
| 19 |
|
10.8%★
|
7★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 20 |
|
10.1%★
|
6★ | 1.3% (4)★ |
|
| 21 |
|
9.9%★
|
13★ | 1.7% (5)★ |
|
| 22 |
|
9.2%★
|
10★ | 1.3% (4)★ |
|
| 23 |
|
8.7%★
|
22★ | 1.3% (4)★ |
|
| 24 |
Reddit r/cybersecurity
organization
|
8.1%★
|
39★ | 1.3% (4)★ |
|
| 25 |
MITRE ATT&CK
organization
|
8.0%★
|
30★ | 1.3% (4)★ |
|
| 26 |
|
7.9%★
|
3★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 27 |
|
7.9%★
|
15★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 28 |
Gartner Security
organization
|
7.6%★
|
36★ | 1.3% (4)★ |
|
| 29 |
|
7.0%★
|
21★ | 1.7% (5)★ |
|
| 30 |
Katie Moussouris
person
|
6.6%★
|
27★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 31 |
5.9%★
|
35★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
|
| 32 |
Troy Hunt
person
|
5.7%★
|
33★ | 1.3% (4)★ |
|
| 33 |
|
5.6%★
|
22★ | 1.3% (4)★ |
|
| 34 |
IBM Security
organization
|
4.5%★
|
14★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 35 |
FIRST
organization
|
4.4%★
|
44★ | 1.3% (4)★ |
|
| 36 |
|
4.3%★
|
5★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 37 |
Bishop Fox
organization
|
3.6%★
|
36★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 38 |
|
3.5%★
|
11★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 39 |
|
3.3%★
|
12★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 40 |
Kevin Mitnick
person
|
3.3%★
|
15★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 41 |
Elastic Security
product
|
3.0%★
|
15★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 42 |
|
3.0%★
|
16★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 43 |
|
2.9%★
|
17★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 44 |
|
2.8%★
|
22★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 45 |
|
2.7%★
|
23★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 46 |
Cyberscoop
organization
|
2.5%★
|
32★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 47 |
NCC Group
organization
|
2.5%★
|
31★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 48 |
OWASP Global AppSec
event
|
2.1%★
|
42★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 49 |
BSides
event
|
2.1%★
|
46★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 50 |
SANS Institute
organization
|
2.1%★
|
41★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 51 |
Reddit r/netsec
organization
|
2.1%★
|
47★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 52 |
SecurityWeek
organization
|
2.0%★
|
51★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 53 |
Google Project Zero
product
|
2.0%★
|
52★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 54 |
Microsoft Security Blog
product
|
2.0%★
|
53★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 55 |
Risky Business
organization
|
2.0%★
|
54★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 56 |
Mikko Hyppönen
person
|
2.0%★
|
17★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 57 |
Offensive Security
organization
|
1.9%★
|
22★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 58 |
Schneier on Security
product
|
1.9%★
|
15★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 59 |
Secureworks
organization
|
0.4%★
|
14★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 60 |
|
0.3%★
|
33★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 61 |
ShmooCon
event
|
0.3%★
|
41★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 62 |
Threatpost
organization
|
0.3%★
|
53★ | 1.0% (3)★ |
|
| 63 |
Stack Exchange Information Security
organization
|
0.2%★
|
46★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 64 |
Carbon Black
product
|
0.1%★
|
7★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 65 |
|
0.1%★
|
12★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 66 |
|
0.1%★
|
14★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 67 |
PwC Cybersecurity
organization
|
0.0%★
|
25★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 68 |
0.0%★
|
36★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
|
| 69 |
MIT CSAIL Cybersecurity
organization
|
0.0%★
|
37★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 70 |
|
0.0%★
|
42★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 71 |
|
0.0%★
|
43★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 72 |
1Password
product
|
0.0%★
|
45★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 73 |
Beyond Identity
product
|
0.0%★
|
46★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 74 |
|
0.0%★
|
47★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 75 |
|
0.0%★
|
50★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 76 |
|
0.0%★
|
52★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 77 |
|
0.0%★
|
53★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 78 |
Infosecurity Europe
event
|
0.0%★
|
59★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 79 |
0.0%★
|
60★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
|
| 80 |
CyCon
event
|
0.0%★
|
65★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 81 |
AWS re:Inforce
event
|
0.0%★
|
66★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 82 |
0.0%★
|
67★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
|
| 83 |
DevSecCon
event
|
0.0%★
|
68★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 84 |
Hack The Box Forums
organization
|
0.0%★
|
72★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 85 |
TryHackMe Community
organization
|
0.0%★
|
73★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 86 |
ISACA
organization
|
0.0%★
|
74★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 87 |
ISSA
organization
|
0.0%★
|
75★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 88 |
AlienVault OTX
organization
|
0.0%★
|
78★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 89 |
KrebsOnSecurity
organization
|
0.0%★
|
79★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 90 |
Bleeping Computer
organization
|
0.0%★
|
82★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 91 |
Talos Intelligence Blog
product
|
0.0%★
|
89★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 92 |
Krebs Stamos Group Blog
product
|
0.0%★
|
90★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 93 |
Darknet Diaries
organization
|
0.0%★
|
91★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 94 |
Security Now
organization
|
0.0%★
|
93★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 95 |
Smashing Security
organization
|
0.0%★
|
94★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 96 |
Malicious Life
organization
|
0.0%★
|
95★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 97 |
Forrester Security & Risk
organization
|
0.0%★
|
96★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 98 |
IDC Security
organization
|
0.0%★
|
97★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 99 |
SANS Reading Room
organization
|
0.0%★
|
98★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 100 |
SANS Cyber Security
organization
|
0.0%★
|
99★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 101 |
IppSec
organization
|
0.0%★
|
100★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 102 |
John Hammond
organization
|
0.0%★
|
101★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 103 |
0.0%★
|
102★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
|
| 104 |
Mandiant M-Trends
product
|
0.0%★
|
103★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 105 |
IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report
product
|
0.0%★
|
104★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
| 106 |
Crowdstrike Global Threat Report
product
|
0.0%★
|
105★ | 0.3% (1)★ |
|
More Reports
View Aggregate Report (All 3 Questions)Frequently Asked Questions
What is this AI Mentions Report about?
This report analyzes how AI chatbots like Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest), OpenAI ChatGPT Latest, Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest) respond to questions related to Cybersecurity. It identifies which brands, products, and organizations are mentioned most frequently and measures their share of voice in AI responses.
What questions were analyzed in this report?
This report analyzed answers to 3 questions:
- "What are the best Cybersecurity options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space." (view report)
- "If I'm looking to get into Cybersecurity, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed." (view report)
- "What does the Cybersecurity industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry." (view report)
How many brands were analyzed in this report?
This report analyzed 106 unique brands mentioned across 5 AI models.
How many web sources were detected?
AI models cited 147 unique web sources (domains) when answering questions.
Which brands are mentioned most by AI models?
The top 3 most mentioned brands are Palo Alto Networks (organization,product), CrowdStrike (organization,product), Fortinet (organization,product), based on analysis of 5 AI model responses.
How many AI models were analyzed?
This report analyzed responses from 5 AI models: Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest), OpenAI ChatGPT Latest, Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest).
What does "Share of Voice" mean and how is it calculated?
Share of Voice (Voice %) measures brand prominence across AI models.
Formula: Share of Voice = Model Coverage × Quality Score
Where:
• Model Coverage = Sum of normalized weights for models mentioning the brand
• Quality Score = Prominence / Max Prominence in dataset
• Prominence = Mentions × (1 / log₂(Position + 1))
Model weights (based on Monthly Active Users):
• OpenAI ChatGPT Latest: 900M MAU (~54.1% weight)
• Google Gemini Flash (latest): 650M MAU (~39.1% weight)
• Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest): 45M MAU (~2.7% weight)
• X.AI Grok (latest): 39M MAU (~2.3% weight)
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest): 30M MAU (~1.8% weight)
Brands appearing in top positions across high-traffic models achieve higher Share of Voice.
Formula: Share of Voice = Model Coverage × Quality Score
Where:
• Model Coverage = Sum of normalized weights for models mentioning the brand
• Quality Score = Prominence / Max Prominence in dataset
• Prominence = Mentions × (1 / log₂(Position + 1))
Model weights (based on Monthly Active Users):
• OpenAI ChatGPT Latest: 900M MAU (~54.1% weight)
• Google Gemini Flash (latest): 650M MAU (~39.1% weight)
• Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest): 45M MAU (~2.7% weight)
• X.AI Grok (latest): 39M MAU (~2.3% weight)
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest): 30M MAU (~1.8% weight)
Brands appearing in top positions across high-traffic models achieve higher Share of Voice.