Cybersecurity
AI mentions in answer for 1 question: "If I'm looking to get into Cybersecurity, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed."
2025-12-30
79
Brands
134
Sources
1
Questions
5
AI Models
About This Report
This report was generated for brands and citations mentioned in answers about Cybersecurity from 5 AI models (namely: Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest),
OpenAI ChatGPT Latest,
Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest)). AI models were asked the following questions:
- "What are the best Cybersecurity options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space." (view report)
- "If I'm looking to get into Cybersecurity, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed." (view report)
- "What does the Cybersecurity industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry." (view report)
Brand Rankings
Brands mentioned by AI models, ranked by share of voice
| # | Brand | Voice | Position | Mentions | AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
88.6%★
|
4★ | 4.3% (12)★ |
|
| 2 |
|
67.6%★
|
5★ | 3.6% (10)★ |
|
| 3 |
NIST
organization
|
58.2%★
|
4★ | 4.3% (12)★ |
|
| 4 |
|
45.2%★
|
13★ | 5.1% (14)★ |
|
| 5 |
OWASP
organization
|
42.6%★
|
6★ | 3.6% (10)★ |
|
| 6 |
|
39.3%★
|
7★ | 2.9% (8)★ |
|
| 7 |
ISACA
organization
|
36.9%★
|
4★ | 2.5% (7)★ |
|
| 8 |
Troy Hunt
person
|
25.0%★
|
16★ | 2.5% (7)★ |
|
| 9 |
|
22.6%★
|
14★ | 2.9% (8)★ |
|
| 10 |
|
22.5%★
|
9★ | 2.5% (7)★ |
|
| 11 |
MITRE ATT&CK
product
|
22.3%★
|
11★ | 1.8% (5)★ |
|
| 12 |
Darknet Diaries
product
|
21.1%★
|
26★ | 2.5% (7)★ |
|
| 13 |
|
19.6%★
|
8★ | 1.8% (5)★ |
|
| 14 |
Bitwarden
product
|
19.4%★
|
17★ | 1.8% (5)★ |
|
| 15 |
BSides
event
|
19.2%★
|
21★ | 2.5% (7)★ |
|
| 16 |
Black Hat
event
|
17.2%★
|
21★ | 2.2% (6)★ |
|
| 17 |
DEF CON
event
|
17.2%★
|
21★ | 2.2% (6)★ |
|
| 18 |
RSA Conference
event
|
16.8%★
|
21★ | 2.2% (6)★ |
|
| 19 |
CISA
organization
|
15.9%★
|
5★ | 1.4% (4)★ |
|
| 20 |
Brian Krebs
person
|
14.3%★
|
14★ | 1.4% (4)★ |
|
| 21 |
1Password
product
|
14.1%★
|
17★ | 1.8% (5)★ |
|
| 22 |
The Hacker News
product
|
10.1%★
|
25★ | 1.4% (4)★ |
|
| 23 |
Mikko Hyppönen
person
|
9.2%★
|
16★ | 1.1% (3)★ |
|
| 24 |
|
8.6%★
|
28★ | 1.8% (5)★ |
|
| 25 |
|
6.0%★
|
7★ | 1.1% (3)★ |
|
| 26 |
Dark Reading
product
|
6.0%★
|
30★ | 1.4% (4)★ |
|
| 27 |
|
5.4%★
|
12★ | 1.1% (3)★ |
|
| 28 |
Wireshark
product
|
4.9%★
|
15★ | 1.1% (3)★ |
|
| 29 |
Nmap
product
|
4.8%★
|
16★ | 1.1% (3)★ |
|
| 30 |
Graham Cluley
person
|
4.4%★
|
8★ | 1.1% (3)★ |
|
| 31 |
Reddit r/cybersecurity
organization
|
4.1%★
|
11★ | 1.1% (3)★ |
|
| 32 |
Bleeping Computer
product
|
3.2%★
|
21★ | 1.1% (3)★ |
|
| 33 |
Bruce Schneier
person
|
3.0%★
|
19★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 34 |
Katie Moussouris
person
|
2.9%★
|
23★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 35 |
Risky Business
product
|
2.5%★
|
32★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 36 |
|
0.8%★
|
6★ | 1.4% (4)★ |
|
| 37 |
|
0.7%★
|
8★ | 1.4% (4)★ |
|
| 38 |
|
0.7%★
|
11★ | 1.4% (4)★ |
|
| 39 |
ShmooCon
event
|
0.4%★
|
31★ | 1.4% (4)★ |
|
| 40 |
Threatpost
product
|
0.4%★
|
39★ | 1.4% (4)★ |
|
| 41 |
Kevin Mitnick
person
|
0.3%★
|
19★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 42 |
Reddit r/netsec
organization
|
0.2%★
|
23★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 43 |
|
0.1%★
|
11★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 44 |
Metasploit
product
|
0.1%★
|
18★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 45 |
LastPass
product
|
0.1%★
|
24★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 46 |
NetworkChuck
person
|
0.1%★
|
35★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 47 |
LiveOverflow
person
|
0.1%★
|
38★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 48 |
IppSec
person
|
0.1%★
|
39★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 49 |
InfraGard
organization
|
0.1%★
|
44★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 50 |
|
0.1%★
|
6★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 51 |
44CON
event
|
0.1%★
|
50★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 52 |
CCC
event
|
0.1%★
|
51★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 53 |
|
0.1%★
|
55★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 54 |
|
0.1%★
|
57★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 55 |
Malicious Life
product
|
0.1%★
|
67★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 56 |
CVE
organization
|
0.1%★
|
70★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 57 |
NVD
organization
|
0.1%★
|
71★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 58 |
VirusTotal
product
|
0.1%★
|
76★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 59 |
ENISA
organization
|
0.1%★
|
77★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 60 |
|
0.1%★
|
8★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 61 |
CyberSeek
organization
|
0.1%★
|
78★ | 0.7% (2)★ |
|
| 62 |
|
0.1%★
|
9★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 63 |
|
0.1%★
|
10★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 64 |
Kali Linux
product
|
0.1%★
|
17★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 65 |
Burp Suite
product
|
0.1%★
|
19★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 66 |
|
0.0%★
|
26★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 67 |
|
0.0%★
|
27★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 68 |
John Hammond
person
|
0.0%★
|
36★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 69 |
The Cyber Mentor
person
|
0.0%★
|
37★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 70 |
Stack Exchange Information Security
organization
|
0.0%★
|
42★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 71 |
|
0.0%★
|
54★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 72 |
|
0.0%★
|
56★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 73 |
Security Week
product
|
0.0%★
|
63★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 74 |
Ars Technica Security
product
|
0.0%★
|
64★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 75 |
Naked Security
product
|
0.0%★
|
65★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 76 |
SANS Internet Stormcast
product
|
0.0%★
|
69★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 77 |
Exploit Database
organization
|
0.0%★
|
73★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 78 |
AlienVault Open Threat Exchange
organization
|
0.0%★
|
75★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
| 79 |
LinkedIn Learning
organization
|
0.0%★
|
79★ | 0.4% (1)★ |
|
More Reports
View Aggregate Report (All 3 Questions)Frequently Asked Questions
What is this AI Mentions Report about?
This report analyzes how AI chatbots like Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest), OpenAI ChatGPT Latest, Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest) respond to questions related to Cybersecurity. It identifies which brands, products, and organizations are mentioned most frequently and measures their share of voice in AI responses.
What questions were analyzed in this report?
This report analyzed answers to 3 questions:
- "What are the best Cybersecurity options available today? Please provide a comprehensive overview including: the leading brands and products, top companies and service providers, recognized experts and thought leaders, promising startups and new market entrants, major industry events and conferences, active communities and forums, and influential publications and media covering this space." (view report)
- "If I'm looking to get into Cybersecurity, who and what should I know about? Include the most trusted brands, recommended products and services, reputable companies and providers, influential experts and reviewers to follow, helpful communities and resources, important events and conferences, notable startups disrupting the space, and key publications and media channels to stay informed." (view report)
- "What does the Cybersecurity industry look like right now? Identify the dominant market leaders and brands, best products and services, key companies and providers, influential figures and thought leaders, emerging startups and trends, major conferences and events, active professional communities, and the top publications and media that cover this industry." (view report)
How many brands were analyzed in this report?
This report analyzed 79 unique brands mentioned across 5 AI models.
How many web sources were detected?
AI models cited 134 unique web sources (domains) when answering questions.
Which brands are mentioned most by AI models?
The top 3 most mentioned brands are CrowdStrike (organization,product), Palo Alto Networks (organization,product), NIST (organization), based on analysis of 5 AI model responses.
How many AI models were analyzed?
This report analyzed responses from 5 AI models: Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest), Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest), OpenAI ChatGPT Latest, Google Gemini Flash (latest), X.AI Grok (latest).
What does "Share of Voice" mean and how is it calculated?
Share of Voice (Voice %) measures brand prominence across AI models.
Formula: Share of Voice = Model Coverage × Quality Score
Where:
• Model Coverage = Sum of normalized weights for models mentioning the brand
• Quality Score = Prominence / Max Prominence in dataset
• Prominence = Mentions × (1 / log₂(Position + 1))
Model weights (based on Monthly Active Users):
• OpenAI ChatGPT Latest: 900M MAU (~54.1% weight)
• Google Gemini Flash (latest): 650M MAU (~39.1% weight)
• Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest): 45M MAU (~2.7% weight)
• X.AI Grok (latest): 39M MAU (~2.3% weight)
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest): 30M MAU (~1.8% weight)
Brands appearing in top positions across high-traffic models achieve higher Share of Voice.
Formula: Share of Voice = Model Coverage × Quality Score
Where:
• Model Coverage = Sum of normalized weights for models mentioning the brand
• Quality Score = Prominence / Max Prominence in dataset
• Prominence = Mentions × (1 / log₂(Position + 1))
Model weights (based on Monthly Active Users):
• OpenAI ChatGPT Latest: 900M MAU (~54.1% weight)
• Google Gemini Flash (latest): 650M MAU (~39.1% weight)
• Perplexity Sonar (with search) (latest): 45M MAU (~2.7% weight)
• X.AI Grok (latest): 39M MAU (~2.3% weight)
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet (latest): 30M MAU (~1.8% weight)
Brands appearing in top positions across high-traffic models achieve higher Share of Voice.